Prosody and pronunciation: reading beyond overall MOS
See how Podonos's naturalness, prosody, and pronunciation sub-scores expose distinct TTS failure modes and help direct debugging.
Notes on voice quality measurement, MOS methodology, and building automated listening pipelines.
See how Podonos's naturalness, prosody, and pronunciation sub-scores expose distinct TTS failure modes and help direct debugging.
Testing TTS at 0.8x, 1.0x, and 1.4x shows how naturalness, prosody, and pronunciation diverge, revealing rate-specific model weaknesses.
See where automated MOS helps with expressive TTS, where its limits appear, and how targeted human evaluation can fill the gaps.
Learn when MOS or WER fits TTS evaluation, where they differ, and how to combine both to assess intelligibility and voice quality.
A comparison of 6 open-source TTS architectures using Podonos scores on the Harvard Sentence List, highlighting trade-offs across naturalness, prosody, and pronunciation.
Aggregate MOS can miss key signals in voice cloning, domain vocabulary, and code-switching; add speaker, pronunciation, and transition checks.
Set up a lightweight automated daily MOS evaluation loop for TTS teams, using fixed audio, thresholds, and clear points for human review.
Behind Podonos calibration: a 2400-rating listening study using ACR, recruited raters, and R-squared to explain model agreement with human scores.
Podonos chose REST instead of a Python library so teams can add voice scoring to PyTorch, Kaldi, and NeMo workflows without changing their environments.
Naturalness scores compress several perceptual dimensions; learn what they measure and why automated MOS has limited resolution at the top of the scale.
MOS measures perceived speech quality on a 1-5 listener scale; rooted in ITU-T P.800 from 1996, automated estimators predict ratings from TTS audio.
Why we built an automated voice quality scoring API, what problem it solves for TTS teams, and what the free tier includes.